F1 confirms Monaco sprint for 2027 as part of 10-race sprint calendar expansion
Monaco to host sprint in 2027 despite overtaking concerns
Formula 1 has confirmed a 10-race sprint calendar for 2027, with Monaco named as one of the events. The announcement last week has proved controversial among fans who question putting a second race on the most difficult circuit for overtaking.
BBC F1 correspondent Andrew Benson said the thinking behind Monaco as a sprint is less about the race and more about qualifying and weekend variability.
"Monaco qualifying is renowned as one of the highlights of the season. In that case, surely two great qualifying sessions is better than one? It was also pointed out by F1 that it gives the chance of two different grid orders and therefore more variability," Benson wrote.
He added a second factor: Monaco is one of the most demanding tracks on the calendar, where drivers have to build up to the limit progressively.
"Get that wrong, push too hard too soon, and the chances of an accident are considerably higher. So asking the drivers to go straight into a qualifying after a single practice session is a really difficult challenge. It is likely to mean more mistakes, more action, more drama, and therefore more entertainment."
The same logic applies to grand prix qualifying after a sprint. "Yes, by then the drivers will have done a sprint race. But there are always changes made to the cars for qualifying, so again the drivers will be going in blind to some degree. Yes, the sprint is likely to be a procession. How could it be anything else? But it adds an extra degree of jeopardy to the whole weekend."
Virtual safety car debate continues after Norris loss
With Kimi Antonelli leading the drivers' championship 81 points clear of Mercedes team-mate George Russell heading into round 15 in Baku, questions remain over the virtual safety car rules.
One reader asked whether F1 might adopt the F2 approach where drivers cannot pit under a VSC but can pit under a full safety car. Benson noted the VSC was discussed at the FIA sporting advisory committee last week with no consensus, and was also on the agenda for the F1 Commission meeting on Monday with no significant developments.
Lando Norris, who lost victory in Madrid by the VSC timing, said drivers had previously discussed with the FIA the idea that the VSC should be out for a minimum of a lap so this sort of thing could not happen.
"But every potential 'solution' comes with consequences. In that case, F1 might end up with a full lap of VSC just to recover a bit of debris. The VSC was introduced so that relatively small-scale incidents could be dealt with without the lengthy disruption of a full safety car. It's accepted that the safety car affords possibilities to gain and lose out, so why should the VSC not do the same?" Benson wrote.
He added the argument is that these swings even out over the season, "although the Norris case in Madrid had particularly dramatic consequences. Antonelli benefited from this one, for example, but has lost out in other scenarios this year. For example, when the VSC gifted Lewis Hamilton the lead in Barcelona, even if that was rendered moot by Antonelli's subsequent retirement."
Russell two-stop strategy in Spain explained
Mercedes split strategies in the Spanish Grand Prix in Madrid, with Antonelli on mediums and Russell on hards. A virtual safety car on lap 14 caught those on hards in the pit-stop window.
Team boss Toto Wolff explained the call: "He said the tyres were not in a great shape, the mediums. We didn't think they would go to the end. (We thought) the better opportunity was not to hang out and wait for a red, but to change the tyres and get on with it."
Russell reflected: "Maybe I could have stayed out with Leclerc but I would have still finished behind him. Maybe I could have not pitted on to the hard again but everything I would have done would have brought us to the same position."
Charles Leclerc, also on hards ahead of Russell, stayed out. With overtaking difficult in Madrid and the hard tyre the best race tyre, Mercedes opted to pit Russell knowing a second stop was likely.
Rules on giving places back apply regardless of intervening cars
In Madrid, Max Verstappen was told to hand a place back to Lewis Hamilton after a first-lap infringement. He also got ahead of Antonelli at the start, meaning he had to let two Mercedes past.
Benson confirmed the rule applies even with other cars in between. "If a driver is adjudged to have committed an offence that requires giving the place back, they must do so regardless of whether there are at that point other cars between them."
Once Verstappen had given the place back, the message "no further action" was displayed on timing screens.
Historical precedents include Fernando Alonso in 2005 Japan, where he was ordered to cede a position two laps later after cutting the chicane, and Silverstone 2010 where Alonso was forced to give up a place to Robert Kubica, who had already retired, resulting in a drive-through penalty.
The Azerbaijan Grand Prix runs 24-26 September with live commentary on BBC Radio 5 Live and Sports Extra and live text updates on BBC Sport.